Israel War Cabinet Meet After Iran Attack

by

Israel war cabinet meet after Iran attack.
As Israeli decision-makers pondered an appropriate rejoinder to the aerial onslaught launched by Iran and its associates, Tehran conveyed its intention to refrain from further strikes unless provoked. The majority of the Iranian projectiles and unmanned aerial vehicles were thwarted, including by U.S. military forces.

Latest news : NETANYAHU CALLED OFF RETALIATORY STRIKE ON IRAN AFTER CALL WITH BIDEN – NEW YORK TIMES

Israel War Cabinet Meet After Iran Attack

A dramatic and realistic illustration of a warzone, with the latest news headline “Israel vs Iran War.” The background depicts a city in chaos, with buildings engulfed in flames and smoke billowing into the sky. Military vehicles are seen on the streets, and soldiers from both nations are locked in a fierce battle. Fighter jets zoom overhead, while a sense of tension and urgency permeates the scene. Here is the full news on Israel War Cabinet Meet After Iran Attack.

Israel War Cabinet Meet After Iran Attack :

Amidst heightened tensions, Israel’s council for military affairs convened on Sunday afternoon, following a barrage of aerial assaults unleashed by Iran. These strikes, comprising a barrage of drones and missiles, marked a significant escalation in hostilities, representing Iran’s inaugural direct offensive against Israel after years of covert skirmishes.

While the majority of the onslaught was successfully intercepted, the few projectiles that breached defenses caused only nominal harm, as reported by Israeli defense authorities. Concurrently, the United States affirmed its solidarity by intercepting numerous hostile drones and missiles, despite recent discord regarding Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

The origins of Iran’s retaliatory strike trace back to April 1, when Israeli airstrikes targeted an Iranian diplomatic facility in Syria. Forewarnings of impending reprisal emerged from Tehran, asserting a commitment to abstain from further aggression unless provoked. Consequently, attention shifted towards Israel’s anticipated response in the aftermath of the assault.

Insights gleaned from Israeli officials suggest internal deliberations within the war council regarding potential retaliatory measures. However, these considerations were ostensibly shelved subsequent to a telephonic exchange between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Biden on Saturday. Notably, the extent of discourse between the two leaders remains undisclosed. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant asserted early Sunday that the confrontation with Iran persists unabated.

Additional developments include:

The Biden administration, cognizant of the volatile regional landscape, advises Israel against precipitating broader conflict with Iran.

A dramatic news image of an Israeli fighter jet and an Iranian drone engaged in a high-stakes aerial battle. The sky is filled with smoke and debris from the ongoing conflict. In the background, a cityscape of both Israeli and Iranian territories is visible, with plumes of smoke rising from the ground. The overall atmosphere is tense and chaotic, with a sense of urgency in the air. Here is the full news on Israel War Cabinet Meet After Iran Attack.


Amidst jubilant gatherings in Tehran, Iran’s UN mission portrayed the assault as a direct response to the aforementioned April 1 incident, declaring the matter resolved pending Israeli restraint. Nevertheless, a stern warning was issued, suggesting escalated retaliation in the event of Israeli counteraction.


President Biden announced plans for a Group of 7 summit on Sunday to address the recent hostilities, while the United Nations Security Council scheduled an emergency session.


Israeli military forces conducted airstrikes in Lebanon targeting assets affiliated with Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese paramilitary group. Concurrently, Hezbollah launched a barrage of rockets towards an Israeli military installation in the Golan Heights, a strategically significant region bordering Syria under Israeli control.

Iran Brings A Moment Of Great Risk :

Iran has retaliated directly against Israel for the killings of its senior generals in Damascus, utilizing an onslaught of over 300 drones and missiles aimed at reinstating its credibility and deterrence, as per officials and analysts.

This action marks a moment of considerable risk, with pivotal questions yet to be addressed, they suggest. Has Iran‘s retaliatory strike sufficed to fulfill its demand for vengeance? Or given the relatively feeble outcome — nearly all the drones and missiles intercepted by Israel and the United States — will it perceive the necessity to strike again? And will Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, perceive the robust performance of his country’s air defenses, in collaboration with allies, as an adequate reply? Or will he opt for further escalation with an assault on Iran itself?

With Iran having fulfilled its promise to attack Israel, it is likely hoping to circumvent a broader conflict, note the officials and analysts. They highlight that the Iranians exclusively targeted military installations, evidently striving to minimize civilian casualties, and publicized their attack well in advance.

“Iran’s government seems to have determined that the Damascus strike represented a strategic turning point, where refraining from retaliation would yield more drawbacks than advantages,” remarked Ali Vaez, the Iran director of the International Crisis Group, in an interview. “However, in doing so, the covert warfare it has been engaged in with Israel for years now risks evolving into a tangible and detrimental conflict,” he added, one that could entangle the United States.

“The Iranians have, for the time being, played their hand,” stated Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House. “They opted to challenge Israel’s bluster, feeling compelled to do so, as they perceive the last six months as a concerted endeavor to undermine them throughout the region.”

For years, Iran endured numerous assaults from Israel both domestically and regionally: targeted killings of its nuclear scientists and military commanders, explosions at its nuclear and military installations, cyber intrusions, intelligence penetrations, and a humiliating seizure of nuclear documents.

Nonetheless, since the Hamas-led offensive of October 7 prompted Israel’s intervention in Gaza, Israel has intensified its assaults on Iranian interests and commanders in Syria. Commencing in December, Israel has eliminated at least 18 Iranian commanders and military personnel from the Quds Force, the elite unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps operating beyond Iran’s borders.

Iran had faced internal criticism and disapproval from certain senior figures in proxy organizations like Hezbollah for its cautious stance during the Gaza conflict, particularly in its reluctance to provide greater support to Hamas and in its restraint of Hezbollah, its close ally in southern Lebanon, as mentioned by Ms. Vakil. With the Saturday attacks, “I believe Tehran recognized the necessity to draw this line in the sand and convey to Israel that Iran does indeed have boundaries and will no longer tolerate the gradual erosion of its position,” she stated.

Tehran felt compelled to retaliate, even if its offensive garnered staunch American support and broad Western diplomatic backing for Israel, temporarily alleviating some pressure off Israel concerning its Gaza intervention and once again isolating Iran.

Currently, Ms. Vakil asserted, both sides find themselves at an impasse, both prepared for escalation but cognizant of the massive harm it would inflict upon themselves.

Leave a comment